The Philosopher's Eye

News and brain candy for the philosophy community

David Letterman and Philosophy

The_Late_ShowDavid Letterman´s affairs with female staff members yielded an interesting moral issue: the Paradox of Blackmail. This is not the “newest news”, yet I just read it and had to share it with you all. The article from The New Yorker can be read here. The main point is that Robert Joel Halderman is now being prosecuted under the accusation of committing blackmail: threatening to expose Letterman’s affairs, unless the talk-show host gives him some money.
But where lays the Paradox? If we break the action of blackmailing into two separate parts, we end up having the following: firstly, Halderman threatens to expose publicly some information; secondly, he asks for some money as part of a business transaction. Analyzed in this way, both actions are perfectly legal. Nonetheless, when put together, they characterize blackmail and trigger moral repulse. And there lays the Paradox…
Some philosophers have attempted to explain the Paradox of Blackmail. Saul Smilansky believes that blackmail is actually a fairly standard capitalist practice, and even though we have no god reasons to legalize it, our repulse towards the practice is unjustified.
I believe the best explanation was given by Richard Epstein (University of Chicago and NYU). He explains the moral and legal condemnation of blackmail through a sort of kantian argumentation. In an article called “Blackmail, Inc.”, he argues that if we hypothetically consider a world where blackmail is legal, then the consequences are morally objectionable – given that it would lead ultimately to lying, and lying is wrong. Thus our response to the practice would be justified.
If this solves the problem or not is still an open question… either way, interesting philosophical discussion!

Related Articles
$1.99 - small A Primer on the Distinction between Justification and Excuse

By Andrew Botterell , University of Western Ontario
(Vol. 3, December 2008)
Philosophy Compass

One comment on “David Letterman and Philosophy

  1. symbiant
    November 12, 2009

    Blackmail-I thought this had common place in our society. You’ve been to D.C. haven’t you? You can’t get something in D.C. without having something on someone. In other terms, that’s called “MOTIVATION.” But “BLACKMAIL” only works when you’re not setting it up against such a sly fox as Letterman. Blackmail only works if the person feels that what you have will cause them to lose something for which they themselves are in separable from. If a person is willing to tell the truth on themselves, they in turn prove a point, that it is better to tell the truth. Dave just so happens to be suffering from a classic case of FROZEN PUBERTY-FAST CARS, AND EVEN FASTER AND YOUNGER WOMEN. LOL!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on November 12, 2009 by in Viewpoint and tagged , , , , .

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 479 other followers

%d bloggers like this: